EdTech Taiwan Market Research: Strategic Analysis & User Personas

Comprehensive market research identifying strategic opportunities at Taiwan's EdTech inflection point. In 2025, I surveyed 905 stakeholders to inform expo strategy, exhibitor positioning, and engagement approaches. The findings revealed that Taiwan's EdTech industry is recovering from post-pandemic decline while accelerating due to AI integration, with investment and adoption rebounding strongly.

EdTech Taiwan Market Research

In 2025, I led comprehensive market research for the EdTech Taiwan Expo to identify strategic opportunities at a critical market inflection point. The research revealed that Taiwan's EdTech industry is recovering from post-pandemic decline while accelerating due to AI integration, with investment and adoption rebounding strongly. The findings informed expo strategy, exhibitor positioning, and engagement approaches to maximize industry impact.

ROLE

Lead Researcher & Strategic Analyst

RESEARCH SCOPE

KEY FINDINGS

Market Dynamics

AI-Driven Market Recovery
Following the post-pandemic slowdown in EdTech investment, generative AI has reignited market momentum. 2024 marked a clear rebound in EdTech funding as entrepreneurs developed AI-powered learning solutions.

Mature Market with Rising Micro-Entrepreneurs

Expanding Market Segments

High Adoption Readiness

Critical Implementation Gap

Strategic User Personas

I developed 3 detailed personas representing distinct decision-makers in Taiwan's EdTech ecosystem:

1. Director Li (李主任) - The Stable Implementer

Educational Administrator | Early Adopter
Profile: Female, 46-55, Academic/Teaching Director at public middle/high school (600-1000 students), Master's degree

Pain Points:

  • Using LMS/SIS for only partial courses with integration difficulties
  • Teachers have varying adoption rates, insufficient IT support
  • Must comply with MOE regulations and navigate complex subsidy processes
  • Vendor proposals often too idealistic without operational support

Decision Criteria:

  • Does it reduce teacher workload and simplify administrative processes?
  • Can it integrate seamlessly with existing SIS/LMS systems?
  • Does it align with government subsidy programs (e.g., Smart Learning Advancement Plan)?

Budget: NT$800K-3M annual (6-9 month planning cycle from policy application to implementation)

What Exhibitors Should Provide: Policy-aligned solutions with teacher training packages, integration support, efficiency case studies, and interactive booth experiences enabling "ask, touch, take-home stories"

2. Teacher Yang (楊老師) - The Advanced Integrator

Curriculum Innovation Leader | Early Adopter
Profile: Female, 36-45, Subject coordinator, Master's degree, 8-12 years teaching experience

Goals:

  • Convert new technology into effective teaching tools that improve student outcomes
  • Find platforms that integrate with existing lesson prep, assignment submission, and grading workflows
  • Cultivate students' digital literacy and learning autonomy

Pain Points:

  • Materials and tools lack direct connectivity, requiring time-consuming format conversion
  • Cross-platform account management is complex
  • Students have varying digital literacy levels
  • Outdated school hardware and unstable internet make ideal implementations difficult

Decision Criteria:

  • Can I test a free version first to confirm effectiveness?
  • Does it offer modular customization that integrates with my existing teaching habits?
  • Are there actual classroom case studies demonstrating differentiated instruction?

Budget: Tests free versions first, invests only after confirming value; prioritizes long-term utility

What Exhibitors Should Provide: Modular demo areas, differentiated instruction strategy showcases, teacher resource trial packages, and presentation templates showing real classroom applications

3. Teacher Lin (林老師) - The Steady Adopter

Homeroom/Subject Teacher | Early Majority
Profile: Female, 36-55, Bachelor's degree, 15-25 years teaching experience, digitally familiar but not trend-chasing

Goals:

  • Find ready-to-use tools that reduce lesson prep burden
  • Don't want to drastically change teaching methods - just assist and optimize
  • Hope technology improves student engagement and classroom interactivity
  • Want school support and peer adoption to reduce solo exploration uncertainty

Pain Points:

  • Learning new tools takes too much prep time away from teaching
  • Teaching environment and tool support often disconnect (unstable networks, systems can't sync)
  • Previous failed tech attempts have reduced confidence and motivation

Decision Criteria:

  • Is there a success case where tools directly apply to my existing curriculum structure?
  • Is it an integrated all-in-one platform that reduces multiple logins?
  • Is there an implementation guide or teaching template to lower trial barriers?

Budget: Prefers proven intuitive solutions with success cases; willing to invest if it lowers learning curve and administrative burden

What Exhibitors Should Provide: "No pedagogical change needed" use cases, curriculum transformation examples, one-stop platform integration diagrams, downloadable teacher implementation guides

STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on persona insights and market pain points, I provided exhibitors with targeted positioning strategies:

For Director Li (Administrators):

For Teacher Yang (Advanced Teachers):

For Teacher Lin (Steady Teachers):

IMPACT ON EXPO STRATEGY

This research fundamentally shaped the 2025 EdTech Taiwan Expo design:

Audience Engagement:

Exhibitor Positioning:

Program Design:

Market Narrative:

METHODOLOGY

Survey Design & Distribution
Designed questionnaire targeting education professionals through EdTech communities and school networks • Achieved 905 valid responses

Quantitative Analysis
Analyzed market structure, customer segmentation, technology adoption patterns using Innovation Diffusion Theory framework • Identified adoption readiness and barrier distribution

Persona Development
Synthesized survey data with expo observations to create behaviorally-grounded personas • Defined goals, pain points, decision criteria, and budget dynamics for each segment

Strategic Translation
Converted research insights into actionable exhibitor recommendations and expo design principles • Presented findings at exhibitor briefing sessions

WHAT I DID

DOWNLOADS